Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg_final_rendering [2023/11/13 10:45] – [Encoding for High Definition Video] niccolo
+++ doc:appunti:linux:video:ffmpeg_final_rendering [2023/11/13 11:39] (current) – [Encoding for High Definition Video] niccolo
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ^ Basic x264        | Preset: **slow** (or less), Tuning: **film**, Profile: **High**, IDC Level: **Auto** |
 ^ Video encoding    | Average Bitrate (Two Pass), Average Bitrate 4096 kb/s (about 1.8 Gb per hour)  |
-^ Pixel format      |  |
+^ Pixel format      | Our source videos use **yuvj420p pixel format**, so we use the same for the final rendering (see the considerations below).  |
 ^ Bits per sample   | Our source videos use **8 bits per raw sample**, so we stay on this.  |
-^ Color range       |  |
+^ Color range       | We use the **full range** of colors. The **j** letter in the //yuvj420p// pixel format means that YUV values are stored as full 0-255 range (8 bits), as in JPEG. This is better than the so called //studio swing//, with Y in the 16-235 range and UV in the 16-240 range.  |
 ^ Audio codec       | <del>Lame MP3</del> Vorbis  |
 ^ Audio bitrate     | CBR 192 (or higher)  |
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
     -acodec copy \
     "2022-05_balcani.mkv"
+</code>
+=====  Pixel format considerations =====
+We used the **yuvj420p pixel format**. What does it means?
+First of all consider the **420** code; this means tat for each matrix of 4x2 pixels the stream encode all the values for the luminance, only 2 values for the chrominance on the X axis and zero values for the chrominance on the Y axis. This figure explains clearly the 4:4:4, 4:2:2 and 4:2:0 subsampling methods:
+{{subsampling.png?400|Chroma Subsampling}}
+Is file size is not a concern, we might ask ourselves whether a pixel format with less loss of chroma information would be preferable. Obviously is useless to add more chroma information if the final rendering has the same resolution of the original video, but if we are **scaling down** the video resolution we may **retain chroma information** using a different pixel format.
+The fact is that **in movies 4:2:0 is almost lossless visually**, which is why it can be found used in Blu-ray discs and a lot of modern video cameras. There is virtually no advantage to using 4:4:4 for consuming video content.
+Furthermore, it may happen that some players (software or hardware) are not compatible with pixel formats other than 4:2:0.
+===== How to probe a video =====
+How to get the **piexel format**:
+<code>
+ffprobe -loglevel error \
+    -show_entries stream=pix_fmt \
+    -select_streams v YDXJ4050.mp4
+</code>
+How to get the **bits per raw sample**:
+<code>
+ffprobe -loglevel panic \
+    -show_entries stream=bits_per_raw_sample \
+    -select_streams v YDXJ4050.mp4
 </code>
@@ Line 44: / Line 76: @@
   * **[[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32829514/which-pixel-format-for-web-mp4-video|Which pixel format for web mp4 video?]]**
   * **[[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56829755/using-ffmpeg-or-ffprobe-to-get-the-pixel-bit-depth-of-a-video|Using ffmpeg or ffprobe to get the pixel bit depth of a video]]**
+  * **[[https://www.rtings.com/tv/learn/chroma-subsampling|Chroma Subsampling]]**
+  * **[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YCbCr|YCbCr]]**